By Dennis B. Ross for the New York TimesWASHINGTON — The president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, insists on using international institutions to pressure Israel, even after he was
rebuffed in the United Nations Security Council, where he sought a
resolution mandating Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and East
Jerusalem. Mr. Abbas has now announced that he will turn to the
International Criminal Court — a move that will produce Palestinian
charges and Israeli countercharges but not alter the reality on the
ground.
A European official I met recently expressed sympathy for the Palestinians’ pursuit of a Security Council resolution. I responded by saying that if he favors Palestinian statehood, it’s time to stop giving the Palestinians a pass. It is time to make it costly for them to focus on symbols rather than substance.
Since 2000, there have been three serious negotiations that culminated in offers to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Bill Clinton’s parameters in 2000, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s offer in 2008, and Secretary of State John Kerry’s efforts last year. In each case, a proposal on all the core issues was made to Palestinian leaders and the answer was either “no” or no response. They determined that the cost of saying “yes,” or even of making a counteroffer that required concessions, was too high.
Palestinian political culture is rooted in a narrative of injustice; its anticolonialist bent and its deep sense of grievance treats concessions to Israel as illegitimate. Compromise is portrayed as betrayal, and negotiations — which are by definition about mutual concessions — will inevitably force any Palestinian leader to challenge his people by making a politically costly decision.
Continue reading.